Neonatal Med Search


Neonatal Med > Volume 28(3); 2021 > Article
Jeong, Kwun, Kim, Choi, Jung, Lee, Kim, and Kim: Targeting Risk Factors for the Control of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Single Tertiary Center Experience



The aim of this study was to estimate the effect of targeting risk factors for the control of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) among high-risk infants in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).


Infants admitted to the NICU and diagnosed with CLABSI from January to December 2013 were eligible for inclusion to the study. The CLABSI group (n=47) was matched in a 1:2 ratio to the control group (n=94) based on gestational age, birth weight, and Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology-II. Risk factors for CLABSI were identified using the Cox proportional hazard model, and analysis of the effect of these risk factors targeting infection control was performed.


The risk factors associated with CLABSI were prolonged central line dwell days (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.028; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.011 to 1.045; P=0.001), use of a silicone catheter (adjusted HR, 5.895; 95% CI, 1.893 to 18.355; P=0.002), surgical treatment (adjusted HR, 3.793; 95% CI, 1.467 to 9.805; P=0.006), and less probiotic supplementation (adjusted HR, 0.254; 95% CI, 0.068 to 0.949; P=0.042). By targeting these risk factors with a quality improvement initiative, the mean CLABSI incidence rate per 1,000 catheter-days decreased from 6.6 to 3.1 (P=0.004).


Targeting risk factors for infection control significantly reduced the rate of CLABSI among high-risk infants in the NICU.


A large proportion of high-risk newborns who require prolonged placement of a central catheter for parenteral nutrition are vulnerable to central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). CLABSI contributes 4% to 20% in mortality rate and increases patient length of stay by an average of 7 days, a significant increase in attributed cost ranging from $3,700 to $29,000 per infection in the United States [1-3]. Therefore, finding practical and preventive measures to reduce CLABSI is one of the most important issues in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).
The reported risk factors associated with CLABSI include central venous catheter (CVC) dwell days of ≥21 days, parenteral nutrition, prior CVC-associated bloodstream infection, underlying metabolic condition, non-operative cardiovascular disease, presence of a gastrostomy tube, and history of red blood cell transfusion [4-7]. In addition, it is of note that intra-abdominal pathology or surgery also contributes to the increased risk of CLABSI in a tertiary NICU setting [8].
In our NICU, the CLABSI rate increased to 4.8 in 2012 and 6.6 in 2013 per device day. In this study, we aimed to determine the risk factors of CLABSI among high-risk infants and to determine the effect of risk factor-based infection control in reducing CLABSI.


The eligibility criteria for inclusion during the study period from January 2013 to September 2014 were as follows: (1) newborns admitted to the NICU within 4 weeks of age or within 44 weeks of postmenstrual age, and (2) newborns with central catheterization, including umbilical catheters. Exclusion criteria were patients who were transferred to another center, general ward or pediatric intensive care unit immediately after cardiothoracic or abdominal surgery.
The general characteristics of the patient population and the risk factors associated with CLABSI were analyzed. The control group (n=94) was matched with the CLABSI group (n=47) for gestational age (±1 weeks), birth weight (±500 g), and Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology II (SNAP-II) severity [9] in a 1:2 ratio. The patients’ SNAP-II were categorized as normal (0), mild (1–20), moderate (21–40), and severe (>40).
This study was divided into two phases. Phase I (January 2013 to January 2014) was a period of practicing universal precautions only. After analyzing the risk factors associated with CLABSI during phase I, a shift in infection control practice was started in phase II (February 2014 to September 2014), from practicing universal precautions only to initiating efforts to reduce or prevent targeted risk factors for infection control. The use of a silicone central catheter, probiotic supplementation, and prolonged central catheter dwelling time were identified as controllable risk factors for CLABSI. In order to reduce these risk factors, the use of polyurethane catheters and probiotic supplements (Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus acidophilus [Lacidofil, Pharmbio Korea Co., Seoul, Korea]) was implemented for very low birth weight infants who reached full enteral feeding or at the discretion of the neonatologist. Central line insertion and maintenance bundles were also reinforced during phase II. Theoretical and practical education for house staff on hand hygiene, proper central line insertion, and dressing changes were provided. In addition, daily discussion regarding the necessity of central lines during attending physician rounds was conducted.
The diagnosis of CLABSI was made by our institution’s infection control unit when the patient met the criteria of laboratoryconfirmed bloodstream infection (LCBI) with a central line or umbilical catheter in place for ≥2 days. We used LCBI 3 criteria defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Healthcare Safety Network (CDC/NHSN) for the neonates admitted to our NICU who meet the following criteria [10]. First, the infant should have at least one of the following clinical symptoms: fever (>38°C core temperature), hypothermia (<36°C core temperature), apnea, or bradycardia. Second, positive laboratory results should not be related to infection at another site. Third, the same common organism was cultured from ≥2 blood cultures drawn on separate occasions. The CLABSI incidence rate was calculated in two ways: number of CLABSIs per 1,000 catheterdays and number of CLABSIs per 1,000 patient-days. The central line utilization ratio is defined as the number of central line days per number of patient-days per year. If multiple episodes of CLABSI were encountered, only the first incidence of CLABSI was used for risk factor analysis. We defined early-onset sepsis as bacteremia occurring before 72 hours of life, and late-onset sepsis occurring after 72 hours of life. Surgical treatments and probiotic supplements were included only in cases prior to CLABSI.
We used a 28-gauge polyurethane catheter (Premicath, Vygon, Norristown, PA, USA), a polyurethane umbilical catheter (Human Catheter, Insung Medical Co., Wonju, Korea), and a 24-gauge silicone catheter (ECC, Vygon) for central line insertion during the study period. Central catheters were inserted under sterile conditions, including the use of sterile gowns, caps, and masks during catheter placement after skin disinfection with 2% chlorhexidine solution. The insertion site was covered with a transparent film dressing (Tegaderm, 3M Health Care, Neuss, Germany). Catheter hubs were cleaned with alcohol every time they were accessed.
SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) and IBM SPSS Statistics version 20.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA) were used for the analysis of the risk factors for CLABSI. Pre- and postinitiative patient populations were compared using the Student t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test, where appropriate, for continuous variables, and the chi-square or Fisher exact test for categorical variables. Cox proportional hazard model with a sandwich variance estimate was used. The hazard ratio (HR) of CLABSI associated with the parameters was estimated in the range of 95% confidence interval (CI). Statistical significance was set at P<0.05 .


Among 700 infants born in 2013 eligible for this study, 23 were transferred to other hospitals and were excluded. Of the 677 infants who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 47 (6.94%) were diagnosed with CLABSI. The control group was matched in a 1:2 ratio with the CLABSI group, resulting in a total of 94 neonates as control. Of the 141 infants, 61 (43.3%) underwent surgical treatment. The mean gestational age and birth weight were 31±5 weeks and 1,444±781 g, respectively (Table 1). There was no significant difference in the distribution of SNAP-II severity or other matching variables between the two groups. A total of 50 microorganisms were isolated from the CLABSI group; 40 (80%) were gram-positive bacteria and 10 (20%) were gram-negative bacteria. During the study period, the most common pathogens associated with CLABSIs were coagulase-negative staphylococci (n=27, 54%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (n=8, 16%), and Burkholderia cepacia (n=6, 12%) (Table 2). The mean onset of CLABSI was 37.1 days (range, 5 to 149) and all CLABSI episodes occurred after 72 hours of life.
Compared with the control group, the CLABSI group had a higher rate of silicone central catheter use, longer days of central catheter placement, longer days to achieve full enteral feeding, and longer duration of hospital stay. The CLABSI group used less probiotics than the control group during the NICU stay (P=0.043) (Table 3). The incidence of all surgical treatments and major surgeries was higher in the CLABSI group than in the control group.
The risk factor analysis for CLABSI using the Cox proportional hazard model with sandwich variance estimate is shown in Table 3. Univariate model analysis showed that the use of a silicone central catheter, probiotic supplementation, prolonged central catheter dwelling time, history of surgical treatment and major surgery, and prolonged time to achieve full enteral feeding were significantly associated with CLABSI. After adjusting for confounding factors, the HR of CLABSI significantly decreased with shorter duration of central line placement, usage of polyurethane catheter, and probiotic supplementation (Table 4).
The changes in clinical infection control practices focusing on risk factors between phases I and II are shown in Table 5. The mean CLABSI incidence rate per 1,000 catheter-days decreased from 6.6 to 3.1 despite increased central line utilization ratio from 0.56 to 0.69 (P=0.004) (Figure 1). The usage of polyurethane catheters increased from 4.0% to 16.0%, and probiotic use increased from 12.6% to 19.5% during phase II.


The basic neonatal characteristics, specifically sex, intrauterine growth restriction, respiratory distress syndrome, patent ductus arteriosus, and intraventricular hemorrhage, did not have a statistically significant effect on the occurrence of CLABSI when confounding factors were adjusted using the Cox proportional hazard model, as in other reports [4]. The SNAP-II was used in our study as a matching variable to compare the effects of prognostic severity. Although SNAP-II severity has been used to predict the propensity towards mortality among preterm infants under gestational age of 35 weeks, it has also been used for term, as well as late term infants [11]. In our study, the CLABSI group showed a higher proportion of surgical treatment (P=0.006). As a tertiary NICU, the proportion of patients who needed surgical treatment, including pediatric surgery, neurosurgery, cardiothoracic surgery, urologic surgery, and otorhinolaryngologic surgery, was higher (43.3%) than in other Korean NICUs [12]. The reason why surgery is associated with an increased occurrence of CLABSI is unclear. A proportion of CLABSI is caused by enteric pathogens, which can colonize the skin and the CVC, with or without surgical manipulation that breaks bowel wall integrity [13]. Prolonged exposure to parenteral nutrition is another risk factor related to recent surgery or associated to poor medical conditions that hinder the advancement of enteral feeding.
Our study suggests that targeting either the introduction of beneficial factors or avoidance of individual risk factors in each center would facilitate more effective infection control in combating CLABSI. For example, the average aggregate CLABSI rate decreased significantly with increased use of polyurethane central catheters [14] and probiotics [15].
Many studies have suggested that the longer the central catheter dwell time, the greater the risk of catheter complications, including CLABSIs [16-19]. A multicenter study showed that the risk of CLABSI increased during the first 2 weeks after CVC insertion and remained elevated until CVC removal [20]. Prolonged catheter dwell times also showed higher CLABSI risk in our study; however, the association was weak, with an HR of 1.028. This is believed to be due to the finding that the study participants showed relatively long central catheter dwell times (52.23±39.99 days vs. 33.63±25.23 days, P=0.005). Since most of the central catheters are routinely used in high-risk infants to provide access for prolonged intravenous medication and parenteral nutrition in the NICU [21], promoting enteral feeding could reduce the risk of CLABSI while shortening the central catheter dwell time.
Use of a polyurethane central catheter was also identified as a factor that reduced CLABSI in this study. Silicone and polyurethane CVC lines were associated with different types of complications due to their physical properties, such as tensile strength, resistance, and flow rate [14,22]. The superiority of the polyurethane catheter to the silicone catheter was not consistent across studies. In a retrospective analysis of adult patients, the rates of CLABSI and thrombotic complications were more frequently associated with polyurethane catheters than with silicone catheters [23]. Conversely, silicone catheters were associated with higher rates of CLABSI [14] and colonization among newborn infants [24]. Silicone is a soft material that is flexible and easy to insert into the vein of an infant with reduced vein trauma. However, because of its flexibility, the wall of the catheter must be thick to achieve catheter resistance. Since this leads to a decrease in flow rate, it may result in a higher occlusion rate and catheter rupture. Polyurethane is a stiff material, which results in increased catheter resistance and an increased flow rate due to the thinner wall of the catheter [25]. However, some studies suggest a greater incidence of pericardial and pleural effusion with polyurethane catheters than with silicone catheters [26].
The rationale for probiotic supplementation is to normalize the gut microbiome with exogenous microorganisms, increasing the resistance of the intestinal mucosal barrier to prevent the translocation of bacteria, modifying the host response to microbial products, and enhancing enteral nutrition and gut maturation [15,27]. Although theoretically promising, the use of probiotics in clinical trials has revealed inconsistent results with regard to the prevention of sepsis in this vulnerable population, and meta-analyses have shown that probiotics did not significantly reduce the incidence of sepsis [27,28]. In contrast, a Cochrane review confirmed that probiotic supplementation significantly reduced the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis and mortality [29]. Meta-analyses have shown that probiotic supplementation reduces the time to full enteral feeding [30] and sepsis [31] in preterm neonates. Probiotics may reduce the CLABSI rate either by having a direct beneficial effect on the immune system or by reducing the requirement for central line placement by accelerating the time to reach full enteral nutrition. However, safety concerns remain regarding adverse effects such as probiotics-associated bloodstream infections in immunocompromised hosts with CVCs [32-34]. Further large-scale studies are required to confirm the efficacy of probiotics in CLABSI prevention.
Several considerations should be taken when interpreting our findings. First, as a single-center study showing a high surgical treatment rate and severity score, the device utilization ratio and CLABSI rate itself were higher than those in previous reports [35]. Moreover, decreasing the number of surgical interventions is a difficult task to control, which requires extensive analysis. Second, due to the limitations of the case-control study design, the high incidence of surgical cases and the frequent usage of probiotics might have been a matter of selection bias. Moreover, as central line insertion practices have changed over time, our findings should be confirmed with more recent data.
In conclusion, central catheters are essential for the care of hospitalized infants, and prevention of CLABSI is important to improve outcomes in the NICU population. Additive efforts to target risk factors showed improvements in reducing CLABSI among high-risk infants in the NICU.


Ethical statement

The Institutional Review Board of the Asan Medical Center approved the study (IRB No. 2015-0100). Informed written consent was waived due to the retrospective design of the study.

Conflicts of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Author contributions

Conception or design: E.A.R.K.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: J.J., Y.K., M.K., S.H.C.

Drafting the work or revising: J.J., Y.K., E.J., B.S.L., E.A.R.K.

Final approval of the manuscript: J.J., Y.K., S.H.C., E.J., B.S.L., K.S.K., E.A.R.K.



Figure 1.
Incidence of central line-associated bloodstream infection and central line utilization ratio between phase I and phase II.
Table 1.
Baseline Characteristics of the Study Groups
Characteristic Case (n=47) Control (n=94) P-value
Gestational age (wk) 30.11±5.19 30.03±4.60 0.885
Birth weight (g) 1,500.70±852.03 1,416.21±746.13 0.547
SNAP-II 0.827
 Normal (0) 5 (10.6) 6 (6.4)
 Mild (1–20) 22 (46.8) 46 (48.9)
 Moderate (21–40) 12 (25.5) 27 (28.7)
 Severe (≥41) 8 (17.0) 15 (16.0)
Male sex 22 (46.8) 46 (48.9) 0.812
Apgar 1 min 4.77±2.22 5.48±2.27 0.352
Apgar 5 min 6.45±2.19 6.98±2.08 0.726
Intrauterine growth restriction 16 (34.0) 40 (42.6) 0.330

Values are expressed as mean±standard deviation or number (%).

Abbreviation: SNAP-II, Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology II.

Table 2.
Pathogens of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections
Pathogen No. (%)
Coagulase negative staphylococci 27 (54)
Staphylococcus aureus 8 (16)
Burkholderia cepacia 6 (2)
Enterococcus spp. 4 (8)
Enterobacter spp. 4 (8)
Klebsiella spp. 1 (2)
Table 3.
Neonatal Morbidity and Infection-Related Parameters in the Study Groups
Variable Case (n=47) Control (n=94) P-value
Respiratory distress syndrome 35 (74.5) 70 (74.5) 1.000
Patent ductus arteriosus 26 (55.3) 42 (44.7) 0.233
Necrotizing enterocolitis 6 (12.8) 8 (8.5) 0.426
IVH ≥grade 3 11 (23.4) 12 (12.8) 0.107
All surgical treatment 28 (59.6) 33 (35.1) 0.006
Major surgery* 27 (57.4) 32 (34.0) 0.008
Probiotics 4 (8.5) 21 (22.3) 0.043
C-line, silicone 38 (80.9) 57 (60.6) 0.016
C-line, polyurethane 9 (19.1) 37 (39.4) 0.016
C-line days 52.23±39.99 33.63±25.23 0.005
Days to full feeding 53.07±35.75 37.53±26.46 0.016
Length of hospital stay (d) 83.74±46.18 64.77±42.73 0.017

Values are expressed as number (%) or mean±standard deviation.

* Major surgery included laparotomy, thoracotomy, neurosurgery, and open urologic surgery.

Abbreviations: IVH, intraventricular hemorrhage (defined by Papile’s grading system); C-line, central line.

Table 4.
Change in Clinical Practices between Phase I and Phase II
Variable Phase I (Jan 2013–Jan 2014) Phase II (Feb 2014–Sep 2014) P-value
No. of patients admitted to NICU 815 721
No. of CLABSI events 56 19
No. of patients with central line 326 (40.0) 231 (32.0) 0.001
Total central line dwell (d) 8,543 6,158
Mean CLABSI incidence rate (/1,000 catheter-d) 6.6 3.1 0.004
Patient (d) 15,130 8,955
Mean CLABSI incidence rate per (/1,000 patient-d) 3.7 2.1 0.033
Mean central line utilization ratio 0.56 0.69 <0.001
Central catheter, silicone 313 (96.0) 194 (84.0) <0.001
Central catheter, polyurethane 13 (4.0) 37 (16.0)
No. of probiotics* usage among patients with C-line 41 (12.6) 45 (19.5) 0.026

Values are expressed as number (%)

* Only for Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus acidophilus.

Abbreviations: NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; CLABSI, central line associated bloodstream infection.

Table 5.
Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection Risk Factor Analysis by Cox Proportional Hazard Model with Sandwich Variance Estimate
Variable Univariate model
Multivariate model
Unadjusted HR (95% CI) P-value Adjusted HR (95% CI) P-value
Sex (male vs. female) 0.891 (0.352–2.257) 0.808
Intrauterine growth restriction 0.928 (0.274–3.145) 0.904
RDS 1.000 (0.448–2.232) 1.000
PDA 1.533 (0.758–3.100) 0.235
NEC ≥stage 2 1.573 (0.512–4.831) 0.429
IVH ≥grade 3 2.925 (0.771–11.091) 0.115
All surgical treatment 2.724 (1.326–5.598) 0.006 3.793 (1.467–9.805) 0.006
Major surgery* 2.616 (1.275–5.366) 0.009 4.160 (1.447–11.958) 0.008
C-line days 1.018 (1.007–1.030) 0.002 1.028 (1.011–1.045) 0.001
Days to full feeding 1.016 (1.004–1.029) 0.010
Probiotics 0.150 (0.031–0.711) 0.017 0.254 (0.068–0.949) 0.042
C-line, silicone 9.983 (2.342–42.555) 0.002 5.895 (1.893–18.355) 0.002
C-line, polyurethane 0.100 (0.023–0.427) 0.002 0.170 (0.054–0.528) 0.002

* Major surgery included laparotomy, thoracotomy, neurosurgery, and open urologic surgery.

Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; RDS, respiratory distress syndrome; PDA, patent ductus arteriosus; NEC, necrotizing enterocolitis; IVH, intraventricular hemorrhage; C-line, central line.


1. Saint S, Veenstra DL, Lipsky BA. The clinical and economic consequences of nosocomial central venous catheter-related infection: are antimicrobial catheters useful? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:375–80.
crossref pmid
2. Payne NR, Carpenter JH, Badger GJ, Horbar JD, Rogowski J. Marginal increase in cost and excess length of stay associated with nosocomial bloodstream infections in surviving very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2004;114:348–55.
crossref pmid
3. Yoo S, Jung SI, Kim GS, Lim DS, Sohn JW, Kim JY, et al. Interventions to prevent catheter-associated blood-stream infections: a multicenter study in Korea. Infect Chemother 2010;42:216–22.
4. Wylie MC, Graham DA, Potter-Bynoe G, Kleinman ME, Randolph AG, Costello JM, et al. Risk factors for central line-associated bloodstream infection in pediatric intensive care units. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:1049–56.
crossref pmid
5. O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, Dellinger EP, Garland J, Heard SO, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis 2011;52:e162–93.
crossref pmid pmc
6. Mannan K, Chow P, Lissauer T, Godambe S. Mistaken identity of skin cleansing solution leading to extensive chemical burns in an extremely preterm infant. Acta Paediatr 2007;96:1536–7.
crossref pmid
7. Horbar JD, Plsek PE, Leahy K; NIC/Q 2000. NIC/Q 2000: establishing habits for improvement in neonatal intensive care units. Pediatrics 2003;111(4 Pt 2): e397–410.
crossref pmid pdf
8. Dahan M, O’Donnell S, Hebert J, Gonzales M, Lee B, Chandran AU, et al. CLABSI risk factors in the NICU: potential for prevention: a PICNIC study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:1446–52.
crossref pmid
9. Richardson DK, Corcoran JD, Escobar GJ, Lee SK. SNAP-II and SNAPPE-II: simplified newborn illness severity and mortality risk scores. J Pediatr 2001;138:92–100.
crossref pmid
10. Liang SY, Marschall J. Update on emerging infections: news from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital signs: central line-associated blood stream infections: United States, 2001, 2008, and 2009. Ann Emerg Med 2011;58:447–51.
11. Coleman AJ, Brozanski B, Mahmood B, Wearden PD, Potoka D, Kuch BA. First 24-h SNAP-II score and highest PaCO2 predict the need for ECMO in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg 2013;48:2214–8.
crossref pmid
12. Sung SI, Lee NH, Kim HH, Kim HS, Han YS, Yang M, et al. The impact of surgical intervention on neurodevelopmental outcomes in very low birth weight infants: a nationwide cohort study in Korea. J Korean Med Sci 2019;34:e271.
crossref pmid pmc
13. Polin RA, Denson S, Brady MT, Committee on Fetus and Newborn; Committee on Infectious Diseases. Epidemiology and diagnosis of health care-associated infections in the NICU. Pediatrics 2012;129:e1104–9.
crossref pmid
14. Seckold T, Walker S, Dwyer T. A comparison of silicone and polyurethane PICC lines and postinsertion complication rates: a systematic review. J Vasc Access 2015;16:167–77.
crossref pmid
15. Garland SM, Tobin JM, Pirotta M, Tabrizi SN, Opie G, Donath S, et al. The ProPrems trial: investigating the effects of probiotics on late onset sepsis in very preterm infants. BMC Infect Dis 2011;11:210.
crossref pmid pmc
16. Jumani K, Advani S, Reich NG, Gosey L, Milstone AM. Risk factors for peripherally inserted central venous catheter complications in children. JAMA Pediatr 2013;167:429–35.
crossref pmid pmc
17. Sengupta A, Lehmann C, Diener-West M, Perl TM, Milstone AM. Catheter duration and risk of CLA-BSI in neonates with PICCs. Pediatrics 2010;125:648–53.
crossref pmid
18. Ohki Y, Maruyama K, Harigaya A, Kohno M, Arakawa H. Complications of peripherally inserted central venous catheter in Japanese neonatal intensive care units. Pediatr Int 2013;55:185–9.
crossref pmid
19. Milstone AM, Sengupta A. Do prolonged peripherally inserted central venous catheter dwell times increase the risk of bloodstream infection? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:1184–7.
crossref pmid
20. Milstone AM, Reich NG, Advani S, Yuan G, Bryant K, Coffin SE, et al. Catheter dwell time and CLABSIs in neonates with PICCs: a multicenter cohort study. Pediatrics 2013;132:e1609–15.
crossref pmid pmc
21. Ainsworth SB, McGuire W. Peripherally inserted central catheters vs peripheral cannulas for delivering parenteral nutrition in neonates. JAMA 2016;315:2612–3.
crossref pmid
22. de Lutio E. Which material and device? The choice of PICC. In: Sandrucci S, Mussa B. In: Peripherally inserted central venous catheters Milan:Springer, 2014;7–19.

23. Wildgruber M, Lueg C, Borgmeyer S, Karimov I, Braun U, Kiechle M, et al. Polyurethane versus silicone catheters for central venous port devices implanted at the forearm. Eur J Cancer 2016;59:113–24.
crossref pmid
24. Rudin C, Nars PW. A comparative study of two different percutaneous venous catheters in newborn infants. Eur J Pediatr 1990;150:119–24.
crossref pmid
25. Smirk C, Soosay Raj T, Smith AL, Morris S. Neonatal percutaneous central venous lines: fit to burst. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2009;94:F298–300.
crossref pmid
26. Pezzati M, Filippi L, Chiti G, Dani C, Rossi S, Bertini G, et al. Central venous catheters and cardiac tamponade in preterm infants. Intensive Care Med 2004;30:2253–6.
crossref pmid
27. Nair V, Soraisham AS. Probiotics and prebiotics: role in prevention of nosocomial sepsis in preterm infants. Int J Pediatr 2013;2013:874726.
crossref pmid pmc
28. Jacobs SE, Tobin JM, Opie GF, Donath S, Tabrizi SN, Pirotta M, et al. Probiotic effects on late-onset sepsis in very preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics 2013;132:1055–62.
crossref pmid
29. Sharif S, Meader N, Oddie SJ, Rojas-Reyes MX, McGuire W. Probiotics to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very preterm or very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020;10:CD005496.
crossref pmid
30. Athalye-Jape G, Deshpande G, Rao S, Patole S. Benefits of probiotics on enteral nutrition in preterm neonates: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 2014;100:1508–19.
crossref pmid
31. Rao SC, Athalye-Jape GK, Deshpande GC, Simmer KN, Patole SK. Probiotic supplementation and late-onset sepsis in preterm infants: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2016;137:e20153684.
crossref pmid
32. Koh JY, Seo E, Lee J. A retrospective analysis of characteristics of probiotics associated with invasive bacterial infections in children. Pediatr Infect Vaccine 2017;24:168–77.
33. Zbinden A, Zbinden R, Berger C, Arlettaz R. Case series of Bifidobacterium longum bacteremia in three preterm infants on probiotic therapy. Neonatology 2015;107:56–9.
crossref pmid
34. Kim SY, Woo HK, Kim EK, Jung YH, Koh J, Song IG, et al. Influence of routine probiotic supplementation on the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis and late onset sepsis. Neonatal Med 2016;23:88–94.
35. Dudeck MA, Edwards JR, Allen-Bridson K, Gross C, Malpiedi PJ, Peterson KD, et al. National Healthcare Safety Network report, data summary for 2013, device-associated module. Am J Infect Control 2015;43:206–21.
crossref pmid pmc


Browse all articles >

Editorial Office
34, Sajik-ro 8–gil(King’s Gargen 3 Block 1207), Jongno-gu, Seoul 03174, Republic of Korea
Tel: +82-2-730-1993    Fax: +82-2-730-1994    E-mail:                

Copyright © 2024 by The Korean Society of Neonatology.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next